Hi, folks,
For years, election workers in Mequon employed a strict local standard for absentee ballots missing part of a witness’s address — a standard not apparently used elsewhere in Wisconsin and one the Wisconsin Elections Commission has now said is illegal.
In brief, WEC has told municipalities to count absentee ballots even if a witness only writes a street number, name, and municipality in the address field, without putting the ZIP code or state. For several elections, though, officials in Mequon — a 25,000 city in Ozaukee County, just north of Milwaukee — have been rejecting those ballots if the name of the municipality isn’t unique nationwide.
The city’s controversial practice was the subject of an election commission order in April, telling Mequon officials to count five ballots that the city had planned to reject. The city complied with the order, but the city attorney told me in May that he wasn’t sure whether Mequon officials would comply with WEC’s standard in the future.
For an upcoming story, I called some of the people who run Mequon’s elections (Mequon City Clerk Caroline Fochs has been responsive to my public records request but hasn’t responded to my questions otherwise).
Nancy Martin, a chief inspector at a Mequon polling place, said that she is unequivocally supportive of the city’s witness address policy. She invoked a state law calling absentee voting a privilege, not a right.
Because of that law, she said, “you need to make sure that you're doing your job as a voter, and I don't think that sending incomplete information is doing a complete job as a voter.”
Alisha Campbell, who was an assistant chief inspector at a Mequon polling place in April, wouldn’t clarify whether she agreed with the city policy.
“What you think independently isn't always what you are told to do,” Campbell said. “I will leave that at that.”
Sam Liebert, the Wisconsin state director of All Voting is Local, questioned whether in Wisconsin — the most decentralized election system in the nation, with 1,850 municipalities running elections — there were other communities implementing policies that don’t follow state law or court decisions. But he said the commission stepping in here shows a silver lining.
“It's disappointing what happened in Mequon, but I think also at the end of the day, the system shows that it works,” Liebert said, adding that the commission’s vote to count those ballots was bipartisan. “That should give voters confidence in the system and that people are looking out for them.”
More on this for you soon.
Also, a heads-up: Votebeat will be closed the first full week of July, so this newsletter will be back in your inbox the week of July 13. Feel free to reach out in the meantime: [email protected].
And if you know someone who might like this newsletter, forward it to them! They can sign up for free here.
Misinformation thrives in confusion. Votebeat explains how elections actually work. Help keep it going.
The Big Story

The Trump administration’s multiple investigations of the 2020 election may have more to do with 2026
Our Latest Stories
Federal judge blocks key pillars of Trump executive order restricting mail voting in 2026 election
Federal judge blocks Trump administration’s overhaul of SAVE database
Trump administration’s search for noncitizen voter fraud is driving its election agenda
In Other Voting News
Wisconsin elections chair wants state to speed destruction of Milwaukee’s 2020 ballots amid FBI probe, Wisconsin Public Radio
A federal judge finds a Trump data system to verify voters is unlawful, National Public Radio
Looking for your next read? Check out these other great newsletters.




