This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Hey, Arizona!

It’s been a wild week of breaking news — and the biggest update came from the nation’s highest court, which issued a ruling yesterday weakening a key section of the Voting Rights Act.

That section has long been used to require mapmakers to consider whether district lines give minority voters an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. Under the court’s decision, the law technically remains intact, but it now applies in significantly narrowed circumstances, making it much harder to challenge political maps for being racially discriminatory.

It’s hard to overstate the impact that the decision could have nationally. The change is likely to result in quick, mid-decade redistricting action in certain GOP-led states where that process is controlled by politicians. It will especially affect states across the American South, where the landmark law led mapmakers to draw new congressional districts largely consisting of Black Americans.

Here in Arizona, legal and political experts told me the impact will be more muted, and likely less immediate. Still, the decision is likely to change how our state’s independent redistricting commission, or IRC, draws its voting maps.

Some politicians are already signaling that they could sue over our state’s existing congressional and legislative district boundaries. Experts said any such challenge is unlikely to succeed, and certainly won’t resolve before this year’s midterm election. But if such a lawsuit prevailed, it could force mid-decade redistricting.

Regardless, the ruling is near certain to ripple into our state’s next redistricting cycle. When the IRC reconvenes to draw new maps at the end of the decade, it will have much more free rein to draw whatever lines it pleases — even if those new boundaries chip away at minority groups’ collective voting power.

The experts who spoke with me weren’t entirely aligned on how far-reaching the decision’s impact could be in Arizona and exactly which districts could see changes.

But, broadly speaking, we could potentially see shifts in our state’s two minority-majority congressional districts, CD3 and CD7. Democrats could potentially pick up seats if the parts of those districts were divided into surrounding, more competitive ones, such as CD1 and CD6.

It’s also worth keeping an eye on whether boundaries significantly change in several minority-majority legislative districts statewide, like LD6, which covers nine distinct tribal communities in the northern part of the state, or LD20, which encompasses heavily Latino neighborhoods in Glendale and Phoenix. Republicans could end up with gains in future legislative maps.

That’s it for this week — but I’ll be back in your inbox soon. Tell a friend to sign up here so they don’t miss out.

In the meantime, let me know what I should look into next. You can reach me anytime at [email protected].

On the Lighter Side

A lot of trash talk happens on X, formerly known as Twitter — and earlier this year, the DOJ was using the platform to ragebait Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes.

The saga kicked off when Jesus Osete, principal deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights, responded to a video from Fontes’ official account by demanding “clean voter rolls” by “COB Monday.”

When the day in question rolled around, the DOJ filed a lawsuit in federal court demanding full, unredacted versions of Arizona’s voter rolls.

Osete also posted an update, tagging Fontes: “@AZSecretary didn’t respond! Oh well! See you in court!”

So, when a federal judge ruled earlier this week that the state didn’t have to hand over voter information, Fontes finally fired back.

“Lovely seeing you,” he wrote, attaching a photo of a quote from the judge’s decision.

Let this be a warning to all to be careful what you tweet. 🐦

The Big Story

The Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act. It may change how maps are drawn in Arizona.

The Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act. It may change how maps are drawn in Arizona.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to weaken Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act could create legal challenges to Arizona’s existing election maps and change how districts are drawn going forward.

Our Latest Stories

Judge dismisses Justice Department lawsuit over Arizona’s voter rolls

U.S. District Judge Susan Brnovich’s order, a victory for Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, dealt another blow to the Justice Department’s efforts to obtain unredacted voter files.

Questions swirl as Democratic board picks an ultraconservative new recorder in Navajo County

The Democratic-controlled board of supervisors in Navajo County, Arizona, appointed Republican state Rep. David Marshall as recorder, the county’s top election official.

New voting requirements? Troops at the polls? We asked 37 election experts what could disrupt the 2026 elections.

According to a survey of 37 election experts, President Donald Trump’s executive orders and the SAVE America Act are unlikely to affect voting in the 2026 midterms.

Thumbnail by Getty Images.

Looking for your next read? Check out these other great newsletters.

Chalkbeat

Chalkbeat

Essential education reporting across America

Healthbeat

Healthbeat

Public health, explained.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading